What the Writer Thought of the Event Essay Example for Free

What the Writer archetype of the Event EssayWhat the event symbolized for America was explicitly stated in the editorial Woodstock was the chassis of victor that could be achieved when there is good-will among people. Everyone saw a disaster out of Woodstock in the beginning. People predicted it would abrogate out a havoc. Even hip radio stations warned people against it. It was easy for the Americans to think that such a large forum of people in such a place would end up to no good, especially when its the youth that is involved. How eer, as the event turned out to be a success, America realized that it is not impossible for people to come together and be in a state of harmony at the same time. More eventfully, Woodstock became a realization for America that the power of benevolence could do such amazing things, and could rise above such adversities as short board in water, toilets, pretty trips, and even thunderstorms. Aside from these, Woodstock symbolized for the re st of America that their youth is not going down the drain.Instead, their youth is laudable of respect and emulation, because amidst the prejudice against their capabilities and their elaboration, is their power to rise above the adversity and to display such a culture of good will among perfect strangers. For the p arents of America at that time, Woodstock was a wakeup call that their children did something worthy of their approval , and that this is what is important amidst the drugs and the display of nudity.The bottomline is that Woodstock, for America, had become as symbol of both the power of the youth and the power of benevolence, and the beauty that comes when these deuce powers work together. For the writer, not only was Woodstock Music and Art Fair an Aquarian Exposition of music and peace . It was lots more. It ranked among one of the most important sociological and political events of the decade. Not only was it the largest happening that ever was in history at the tim e, it was as well a public announcement of the culture of Americas youth in the sixties. It was a manifestation of their strength, appeal, and power (TIME, 1969).Along the article, the writer pointed out how massive the gathering was, even estimating that had the roads not been blocked, there would have been a million people between the age of 16-30 at Woodstock. And though the writer acknowledged the presence of the largest gathering of rock idols as a lambast for the crowd to come, he pointed out a more analytical reason for the gathering. According to him, Woodstock was a kind of pilgrimage where the youths sought to discover that there were hundreds of thousand of people who shared their culture, in otherwise words, that they are not isolated, as they have previously thought they were (TIME, 1969).The writer was also quick to acknowledge the event that the old generation of Americans initially saw the event as a squalid freakout, but had experience a change of tune, which i ncluded even the New York Times . Along with this, however, the writer ran a split that told or so both the deplorable and commendable things about the event that could be the reason for such a two-sided perception of the event. The bad side of Woodstock that the writer perceived included deaths and illnesses from drugs, as well as the deplorable case of sanitation, accommodation, garbage, and rains throughout the event.However, the writer exalted in the fact that there were no rapes, no assaults, no robberies and, as far as anyone can recall, not one single fight (TIME, 1969). In the length of the rest of the article, the writer presented several analysis of the meaning of Woodstock. Among these was that Woodstock was a manifestation of the youths valuation of self over society, and aside from the youths total separation from the norms of the past generation, was also a manifestation that the adults could not control them anymore.However, along with these was the youths perceptio n that they are ever-changing the society for the good and that they did not need someone to lead them since they already have each other . In the end, the writer was able to send a message of questioning to his readers. A question of to what intent could the outpouring and extremely powerful emotions of the youth could be harnessed politically. His advice was made implicitly by quoting what a sociologist had to say about the event . Towards the end, the writers advice turned out into a warning about the possible negative impacts of the event, instead of a dawning of enlightenment .