Han vs Rome Ap World

proportional Essay The massively extensive Hellenic imperiums of Imperial capital of Italy (31BCE-476CE) and Han chinaware (206BCE-220CE) were super influential when it came to the world around them. In essence, the two empires were virtu each(prenominal)y the same in terms of giving medicational structure and armament protocols, yet greatly different in the area of ghostly margin. twain Han china and Imperial Rome had a policy-making system structure consisting of a monarch butterfly emperor who made executive, almost dictator- handle, decisions and order the affairs of the empire.However, in two empires, emperors relied on regional g all overnors to regulated affairs in their respective regions due to the fact that two empires were so massive and consisted of an enormous population. These leading would also collect a levy that was obligate on free peasants of the empire. In both empires, the emperor was seen as a god-like figure, for example the mandate of Hea ven in Han China was employ to persuade the citizens that the emperor was a direct link to the gods.Both Han China and Imperial Rome used organized morality as a supporterer in political culture. Confucianism was en oblige by the government and promoted obedience, loyalty, and reverence to ones favorable superiors. In Rome, emperor butterfly Constantine converted to Christianity in 312CE, and used the church as a sort of guidance/advisor. Both civilizations launch a type of civil proceeds based on educated members of the set class. As far as phalanx protocols go, both militaries worked extensively on projects for the empire such as roads to facilitate troop movement.Late in the histories of both empires, inappropriate soldiers were enlisted in the legions due to a drop in population of plagues frivol away the society. The roman prints enlisted the help of the Germanic tribes while the Hans enlisted the help of the Mongols. These mercenary soldiers lacked greatly in mot ivation and pride. Both civilizations enlisted the help of soldiers of the people who were invading them. The military gallantry of both civilizations was used to employ and accommodate peace once expansion was accomplished.While both civilizations consisted of one sovereign emperor, the methods in which emperors imposed their authorities differed between each. In Rome, the emperors resorted to threats and promises, where as in Han China, the emperors relied mostly on the Mandate of Heaven institution and tributes/gifts from the citizens. Both rulers had a slightly different role as well. The Emperor of China was judge, jury, and executioner, whereas the Emperor of Rome could not act without the senates approval.With military outing and empire expansion, the methods were quite different. When the Romans conquered a youthful region, they would enforce soldiers in that region until the value was peaceful. After the tax was paid, the Romans allowed the conquered peoples to keep t heir ethnical ways. This also applied to religion. Conquered peoples could remain with their religion as long as they followed the system. In fact, in 212CE, Rome offered citizenship to conquered peoples in switch over for adopting Roman culture.This offer was extended to all free people of the conquered region, and citizenship for them meant they had the right to hold office, serve in legions, and others. However, becoming a citizen did not erase their other identities like religious views. Rome also collected many unknown religions, making the consummate empire a college of religious views. contrasted Rome, Han China forced Confucian beliefs upon their conquered areas. When the Han invaded and conquered Korea and Vietnam, they accomplished a Chinese-style rule upon the people and forced Confucian beliefs upon them.Han did not collect foreign religions with the exception of Buddhism. Han China and Imperial Roman political structure, military protocols, and religious tolerance share various similarities in political structure and military protocols, and are to a greater extent different in the area of religious tolerance. While both political structures manifold a sovereign emperor who used regional leaders as a way to extend his control to the outskirts of the empire, they differed in the ways the emperor imposed his authority.With military protocols, both militaries were involved in the complex body part of roads that expanded all over the empire. However, the militaries differed in how they treated their conquered peoples with religion and culture. Both empires had some form of religious tolerance. Han Chinese citizens were allowed to practice Buddhism while the Roman Emperor Constantine converted to Christianity. However, Romans had more tolerance for foreign religions in the empire than Han China did.